logo                   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline scotty  
#1 Posted : Sunday, February 06, 2011 10:21:25 AM(UTC)
scotty


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 7/25/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,209

"I saw a reference to a mashing method that yielded 3 types of beer.
XXX---XX and X

I really have no need for more beer but this sopunds interesting and i wondered if starting with a dark lager all grain kit would also allow me to make a second batch of lighter beer.

There is little detail to the method but it aroused my curiosity.

Any comments?????????????????


The fabrication possibilities of the time made it relatively easy to construct large wooden mash tuns, but the technology required to construct equally large kettles had yet to be developed. Consequently, English ale breweries often made three brews from a single mash - strong (XXX), common (XX), and small (X) beer. In fact, this is the historical basis of the categories of Belgian Trappist beers: triple was made from the undiluted wort from the mash, double was made from the runoff from reflooding the first mash, and single was made from a subsequent infusion."
Offline popapina  
#2 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 7:55:22 AM(UTC)
popapina


Rank: Junior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 92

"X=Posion ? or first run ?
XX=2nd run
XXX=3rd run

popapina"
Offline scotty  
#3 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 8:04:26 AM(UTC)
scotty


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 7/25/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,209

Your response is unclear to me.:)
Offline heeler  
#4 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 9:40:38 AM(UTC)
heeler


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 4/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,666

Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 15 post(s)
"I thought the number of X's on a whiskey jug ment the number of times it was distilled???
I have no knowledge of the other reference. Sorry."
Offline scotty  
#5 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 9:57:55 AM(UTC)
scotty


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 7/25/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,209

"
Originally Posted by: heeler Go to Quoted Post
I thought the number of X's on a whiskey jug ment the number of times it was distilled???
I have no knowledge of the other reference. Sorry.


The quote i included tells how this particular beer is labeled or graded. im just reading what is written in my searches.

http://www.google.com/search?q=...earchBox&ie=&oe=


However. i believe my question is.
Has anyone ever heard of using the same mash for more than one wort?"
Offline heeler  
#6 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 11:49:48 AM(UTC)
heeler


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 4/14/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,666

Was thanked: 15 time(s) in 15 post(s)
"Ya know that sounds sorta like an UJSM ---- you know you pour the water in the fermenter the first time and then drain it -- undiluted wort from the mash xxx strong

then add more water to the fermenter on the grain and then drain it -- reflooding the first mash xx common

and a single was made from a subequent infusion -- x small

Scotty, I dont know if any of that is factual but in my pea brain thats what it looks like to me -- I have done the UJSM and it does get weaker as you go if you know what I mean. The mollasses would get weaker with each wash. Just some ramblings of an ageing mind."
Offline div4gold  
#7 Posted : Monday, February 07, 2011 2:28:03 PM(UTC)
div4gold


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/16/2010(UTC)
Posts: 453

I wonder if that's how they came up with the name, "Dos Equis"?
Offline scotty  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:19:13 AM(UTC)
scotty


Rank: Senior Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Moderator
Joined: 7/25/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,209

"I believe you have it. I am just wondering if they do a second mashing or whatever. seems that the second run would basically be a sparge but heated on the grain. then tannins ????? who knows.
Perhaps under malted or unmalted grains were used.

It has me curious. I rwally cant find any more info other than what the present day beers are called.

Originally Posted by: heeler Go to Quoted Post
Ya know that sounds sorta like an UJSM ---- you know you pour the water in the fermenter the first time and then drain it -- undiluted wort from the mash xxx strong

then add more water to the fermenter on the grain and then drain it -- reflooding the first mash xx common

and a single was made from a subequent infusion -- x small

Scotty, I dont know if any of that is factual but in my pea brain thats what it looks like to me -- I have done the UJSM and it does get weaker as you go if you know what I mean. The mollasses would get weaker with each wash. Just some ramblings of an ageing mind.
"
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.